A failing tooth presents a fork in the road: save it with root canal therapy (and usually a crown), or extract and replace with a dental implant. Neither is universally correct. The right answer depends on the tooth, the patient, and an honest assessment of long-term prognosis.

When Root Canal Is the Right Choice

A well-executed root canal followed by a proper crown has 10-year survival in the 85–95% range. Saved teeth keep their original proprioception (the sensory input from the ligament around a natural tooth) that no implant can replicate.

When Implant Is the Right Choice

The “Save Every Tooth” Myth

Some clinicians reflexively favor root canal therapy for every salvageable tooth. Sometimes this is right; sometimes it condemns the patient to years of escalating treatment on a tooth that will be lost eventually — often with less bone remaining for a future implant than was available at the original decision point.

The “Just Pull It” Problem

The opposite error is extracting teeth reflexively. Implants are excellent but not superior to healthy natural teeth. When a tooth can be saved reliably, saving it usually makes sense.

Second Opinions Are Worth It

A prosthodontist’s perspective on a save-or-replace decision is often different from that of a general dentist or endodontist. We see both outcomes downstream — saved teeth that failed years later, and implants that are performing beautifully a decade in. That downstream view informs how we advise at the decision point.

Request a consultation to discuss your case.


Related Articles

Serving Patients Across Greater Boston

The Face Dental Group welcomes patients from throughout Greater Boston:

See all dental services or learn more about our academic authority. Request a consultation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *